LisaLou Post 13 Sometimes it seems hard to believe that there are such high numbers of functional illiteracy. When someone is born, raised and lives in one country all of their life, it is hard to imagine how they can survive without being literate. I know each situation is different, but I think it can be very helpful for successful companies to sponsor reading and literacy programs. Being able to read and understand what one is reading can open up a whole new world for someone.
Email An illiterate is someone who was never taught to read. My mother, an immigrant from Poland, was such an illiterate. She was orphaned at an early age and was never taught Functional illiteracy read.
Even though she was intelligent, her illiteracy severely limited her intellectual and cultural life. But having been raised in a God-centered religious culture, she had acquired that common sense that permitted her to be a very capable mother and wife.
A functional illiterate, on the other hand, is someone who may have spent up to 12 years in public schools and learned to recognize some words as whole configurations, like Chinese characters, but is incapable of Functional illiteracy the written language.
They are frustrated, handicapped readers who find reading so onerous that they avoid it. Purely illiterate persons cannot read or write in any capacity, for all practical purposes. In contrast, functionally illiterate persons can read and possibly write simple sentences with a limited vocabulary, but cannot read or write well enough to deal with the everyday requirements of life in their own society.
But they were not called functional illiterates.
One highly successful functional illiterate told me that he would rather be beaten than have to read, an indication of the psychic pain reading disability can cause.
Thus, one can say that functional illiteracy is worse than just plain illiteracy. For example, I am highly literate in English but totally illiterate in Russian or Armenian or Arabic. But a functional illiterate believes that he is not intelligent enough to be able to read his own language which he can speak quite well.
The primary school he attended actually dumbed him down and impaired the function of his brain. This creates a damaging self-image that can last a lifetime.
Some functional illiterates are driven by their intelligence and ambition to overcome their reading handicap and are capable of creating successful businesses or pursuing successful careers.
Some of the biggest stars in Hollywood have been dyslexic. These individuals are usually from middle class, professional families, where parents will pay thousands of dollars for private tutoring. There are even special schools, like the Carroll School in Lincoln, Massachusetts, that cater to such functional illiterates.
But if you are poor and become a functional illiterate, you will probably remain that way for the rest of your life — a diminished life at that. Since poor children attend public schools that teach children to read by the sight method, many of these children will drop out in high school.
Why schools persist in using teaching methods that create functional illiteracy is not a mystery. It is part of a socialist plan to dumb-down the American people, particularly the poor. Are you shocked by this revelation? Most Americans find it impossible to believe that our professional educators could be involved in a criminal conspiracy to deliberately dumb-down the children in their schools.
But we have absolute proof that this is the case. Indeed, this conspiracy has been going on for over a hundred years. The simple truth is that a plan to dumb-down the American people was hatched in by John Dewey, the socialist educator, who persuaded his fellow socialists that the only way to change America from an individualistic society to a collectivist one was to dumb-down the American people.
The easiest way to do it was to change the way reading is taught in our schools. Their plan was to get rid of the traditional phonics method that produces high literacy and replace it with a whole-word method that teaches American children to read English as if it were Chinese.
This is language study — the study not of foreign language, but of English; not in higher, but in primary education. If we add to this the learning of a certain amount of numerical combinations, we have the pivot about which primary education swings.
It does not follow, however, that because this course was once wise it is so any longer. On the contrary, the fact that this mode of education was adapted to past conditions, is in itself a reason which it should no longer hold supreme sway My proposition is, that conditions — social, industrial, and intellectual — have undergone such a radical change, that the time has come for a thoroughgoing examination of the emphasis put upon linguistic work in elementary instruction.
The plea for the predominance of learning to read in early school-life because of the great importance attaching to literature seems to me a perversion.
But then he added a very important caveat to his fellow progressives, which left no doubt that this was a strategy to deceive the parents of America.
Change must come gradually. To force it unduly would compromise its final success by favoring a violent reaction. If what they were advocating was so beneficial, why would parents react violently against it?
In other words, Dewey and his colleagues were willing to use as much deception as possible to advance the cause of socialism in education. And that deception is still going on today. Winters writes in his book, Teachers Matter: Fully one-third of American public school fourth-graders scored below the Basic level in reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress1.
Definition of Functional Illiteracy. There are obviously several different ways of determining literacy rate. What should be sought in . It is not the illiteracy where a person is unable to read. It is, perhaps, the most dangerous and destructive of all the illiteracies.
We’ve heard the terms illiterates, semi-illiterates and functional illiterates, and we have a good understanding and awareness of the problems associated with these types of illiteracy.
Functional illiterate definition, a person with some basic education who still falls short of a minimum standard of literacy or whose reading and writing skills are inadequate to everyday needs. See more.
Functional Illiteracy The United States Department of Education estimates that functional illiteracy, incompetence in such basic functions as reading, writing, and mathematics, plagues 24 million Americans. Functional illiterate definition is - a person who has had some schooling but does not meet a minimum standard of literacy.
a person who has had some schooling but does not meet a . 1. Definition of Functional Illiteracy.
Functional illiterate definition, a person with some basic education who still falls short of a minimum standard of literacy or whose reading and writing skills are inadequate to everyday needs. See more. Functional illiterate definition is - a person who has had some schooling but does not meet a minimum standard of literacy. A functional illiterate, on the other hand, is someone who may have spent up to 12 years in public schools and learned to recognize some words as whole configurations, like Chinese characters, but.
There are obviously several different ways of determining literacy rate. What should be sought in any determination of literacy rate is accuracy.