In longer theses, it is usual to situate findings in the contexts of past and future research. Contextualising your findings within previous research helps readers to grasp the significance of your research - how your research builds on, and contributes to knowledge. Ask yourself these questions. To what extent do my findings align with those of other scholars, in what precise ways, and if not why not?
Implications for practice Our main aim in this study was to address the almost total lack of research evidence on what it means to mobilise knowledge when operating at the very top of English NHS organisations. We have done so by directly observing and reporting on the daily work of seven trust CEOs, with special attention to the practices whereby these executives made themselves knowledgeable for all practical purposes, as dictated by their specific job.
Accordingly, the first major practical writing research implications examples of the present research is that it provides much needed empirical data on the actual jobs of NHS trust CEOs, their mundane preoccupations, what they do most of the time and with what in mind.
This information is important given that the only other comparable study dates back more than 30 years. For example, authors of policy documents could take note writing research implications examples that most of the time CEOs will not read them directly and are likely to pass them to one of their immediate collaborators.
This will allow them to redesign their documents accordingly. Many others could derive similar implications from most of our findings.
In this sense, we believe that our research is especially timely in the aftermath of the Francis report, which calls on NHS managers to become more open to scrutiny and challenge. A second important implication of our study derives from our finding on the uniqueness of the knowledge and information work carried out by NHS CEOs as part of the TMT.
Our findings point to a specific set of capabilities, information sources, decision styles and strategies, and attitudes towards knowledge and evidence that may set apart the work of the CEO from that of other members of the executive team.
Although analysing our data with a view to identifying and codifying these skills and behaviours goes beyond the remit of the current project, contacts have already been established with the appropriate institutions including the NHS Leadership Academy and the Institute of Healthcare Management to explore how this can be achieved collaboratively in the near future.
A third implication stems from our reframing of the issue of how to nurture and support the knowledgeability of CEOs in developmental, rather than instrumental, ways. In this sense, although our research falls short of developing a fully formed diagnostic tool given its exploratory natureit clearly signposts the main dimensions of a framework for reflecting on the personal knowledgeability infrastructure of NHS executives.
Such dimensions, which derive from our model summarised in Figure 8 above, suggest that executives critically reflect on the following fundamental questions: What is the nature of my organisational and institutional context right now?
What is the nature of my work at present e. What personal style do I tend to adopt i. Do I have the right infrastructure in place both people and objects, e. If not, what do I need to change? The suggestion instead is to embrace more individual-centred and context-sensitive approaches and solutions.
Finally, our study provides indications to recruiters regarding a number of desirable and necessary skills that future CEOs may need to have or develop in order to carry out their jobs. Again, contacts have been established between the research team and a number of NHS bodies so that the findings of the present study can be incorporated in the existing and future capability-building frameworks.
Implications for future research Our study, being of an exploratory and interpretive nature, raises a number of opportunities for future research, both in terms of theory development and concept validation. More research will in fact be necessary to refine and further elaborate our novel findings.
First, while we have generated a number of new and we believe useful conceptual categories, given the in-depth sampling strategy focused on exploring the work of seven trust CEOs, very little can be said of the nature of information work of the larger population of NHS CEOs in England.
Our study could thus be extended in search of statistical, rather than analytical, generalisability, as we have sought here. Second, our study offers the opportunity to refine and validate the concepts and constructs that emerged from our inductive analysis.
For example, the idea of a personal knowledgeability infrastructure will need further refinement and elaboration, in terms of both its component elements and its internal dynamics. One could also ask whether and to what extent it is possible to identify different ideal types of knowledgeable managers, so that a typology of managerial forms of knowledgeability can be constructed.
The model discussed in Figure 9 could also be used to generate a number of hypotheses for further empirical testing using a broader sample and quantitative research methods. Questions could include the following: Is there a statistical correlation between the type of personal infrastructure of knowledgeability, its elements, and the personality of the CEO e.
Is there a statistical correlation between practices of knowledge mobilisation and other outcome measures, such as financial performance, regulatory compliance or dimensions captured by the NHS Staff Survey? Is there a systematic correlation between the types of organisation and the information work carried out by top managers i.
The study could also be extended in longitudinal and comparative ways. For example, here we have hypothesised that CEOs will adapt their styles and practices of knowledge mobilisation in relation to career development and experience.
Further research could elaborate on this point, providing precious information to selection panels and training bodies. Further research could also take a historical perspective and ask if the work of top NHS executives has significantly changed in the last several decades, including a significant shift in skills and attitude and if it should have occurred.discussion and implications Research indicates that teacher quality directly affects student achievement and identifies the teacher as the single most important factor that impacts student learning.
Examples of implication in a Sentence but whereas Updike and Roth work to establish connection and coherence in the face of time's chaos, DeLillo is an artist of diffusion and dispersal, of implication and missing information. Read chapter 8 Implications and Recommendations for Research, Policy, and Practice: Education is a hot topic.
of presidential debates to to Read chapter 8 Implications and Recommendations for Research, Policy, and Practice: Education is a hot topic. professional development can incorporate insights and examples from research on the.
In this chapter, we conclude by briefly foregrounding some of the study’s implications for practice, and some of the directions for future research that stem from the project. In this study, we have sought to respond to a number of research questions related to how knowledge mobilisation is understood, performed and enacted in everyday working practice of NHS trust CEOs in England.
Writing your dissertation’s implications and conclusion summary can be challenging. It is your dissertation’s most important section. Like the conclusion of any college essay, it has to summarize not the content of your findings, but their significance.
Summary Thirty-two junior and senior high school students conducted independent science research for the purpose of competing in local, regional and state science fairs. These students used the Internet to search for sources and to communicate with science mentors, and to publish their completed science fair projects on the World Wide Web.